deppvsheard

 Washington, United States — Actress Amber Heard can't pay her ex Johnny Depp more than $10 million in harms, her legal counselor said Thursday, after a US jury took the side of the "Privateers of the Caribbean" star in a harsh maligning preliminary.

The high-profile broadcast court fight finished Wednesday when a seven-man jury found that Depp and Heard had stigmatized one another, yet shown up undeniably more firmly with Depp.

The jury, following a six-week preliminary highlighting cases and counterclaims of homegrown maltreatment, granted him $10.35 million in harms, conversely, with $2 million granted to Heard.

Asked on NBC's TODAY show assuming Heard will actually want to settle up, her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft said: "God help us, in no way, shape or form."

She added that the "Aquaman" star needs to pursue the decision and "has a few incredible justification for it."

The 58-year-old Depp, who lost a defamation body of evidence against the British newspaper The Sun in London in 2020 for considering him a "tank top," praised the split decision for the situation as a triumph while Heard said she was "heart-broken."

Depp sued Heard over a commentary she composed for The Washington Post in December 2018 in which she depicted herself as a "person of note addressing homegrown maltreatment."

The Texas-conceived Heard didn't name Depp in the piece, yet he sued her for suggesting he was a homegrown victimizer and looked for $50 million in harms.

The 36-year-old Heard countersued for $100 million, saying she was slandered by proclamations made by Depp's legal counselor, Adam Waldman, who told the Daily Mail her maltreatment claims were a "deception."

Awful message

Bredehoft said Depp's lawful group attempted to "belittle" Heard and stifled vital proof in the preliminary, keeping the members of the jury from looking at proof of Depp's supposed maltreatment.

"Various things were permitted in this court that shouldn't have been permitted, and it made the jury be confounded," she said.

"We had a gigantic measure of proof that was stifled for this situation that was in the UK case," she said. "In the UK situation when it came in, Amber won, Mr. Depp lost."

The legal counselor said the decision bodes sick for the MeToo development and will deter ladies from detailing lewd behavior and misuse.

"It's a terrible message," Bredehoft said. "It's a huge misfortune, since that is precisely exact thing it implies.

"Except if you take out your telephone and you video your life partner or your soul mate beating you, successfully you will not be accepted."

Bredehoft was gotten some information about Heard's nearby response to the decision in the preliminary, which occurred in Fairfax County Circuit Court close to the US capital.

"Quite possibly the earliest thing she said is that, 'I am so sorry to that large number of ladies out there,'" she said. "This is a mishap for all ladies in and outside the court, and she feels the weight of that."

Zoo

In an explanation, Heard said "the mistake I feel today is beyond anything that can be described.

"I'm crushed that the heap of proof actually was adequately not to confront the unbalanced power, impact, and influence of my ex," she said.

As far as it matters for him, Depp invited the decision, saying "The jury gave me my life back."

"The best is on the way and another part has at long last started," Depp said in a proclamation.

Bredehoft said web-based entertainment might an affect the case in spite of the fact that members of the jury had been told not to check it out.

"It's basically impossible that they could never have been impacted by it, and it was terrible," she said. "It incredibly was unbalanced."

Heard's lawyer likewise said she went against having the preliminary broadcast.

"I was against cameras in the court, and I went on record with that and had contended against it as a result of the delicate idea of this, however it made it a zoo," she said.